CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW X5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW X5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWLand Rover
Price (RRP)$137,600$146,799
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power219kW183kW
0-100 km/h6.1s7.7s
Fuel Economy7.2 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space650L835L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the BMW X5 & Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW X5 starts from $137,600 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport opens at $146,799. That makes the BMW X5 the more affordable entry point by $9,199.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $151,360 and $161,479 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The BMW X5 features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets a 13.1-inch display and 13.7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW X5 stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport counters with Meridian audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW X5 gets sensatec synthetic leather upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the BMW X5 and 3-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

Drivetrain

The BMW X5 uses a Diesel producing 219kW and 670Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.1 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport responds with a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid making 183kW and 600Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.7 seconds.

The BMW X5 has the clear power advantage at 219kW vs 183kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW X5 is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW X5 measures 4,935mm long on a 2,975mm wheelbase, 11mm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport at 4,946mm (2,997mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Sport generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 650L in the BMW X5 and 835L in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport a 185L advantage.

For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.7m

TightestLand Rover Range Rover Sport Dynamic SE D250Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Land Rover Range Rover Sport Dynamic SE D250
11.0mTighter
Best
BMW X5 xDrive30d
12.7m
Worst
BMW X5 xDrive30d
12.7m · Large

Based on 12.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Range Rover Sport Dynamic SE D250
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestLand Rover Range Rover SportTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW X512.7 m
Large△ 3-point
Land Rover Range Rover SportTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,052/year for the BMW X5 and $2,109/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the BMW X5.

Estimated annual total: $2,052 (BMW X5) vs $2,109 (Land Rover Range Rover Sport). The BMW X5 saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Sport). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW X5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Sport if: You need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW X5 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BMW X5 will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport?

The BMW X5 is the cheapest at $137,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Range Rover Sport by $9,199.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW X5 uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the largest boot at 835L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW X5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW X5 makes the most power at 219kW. The BMW X5 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.1s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs