BMW X7 vs RAM 2500
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the BMW X7 & RAM 2500
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The BMW X7 starts from $174,900 before on-road costs, while the RAM 2500 opens at $172,950. That makes the RAM 2500 the more affordable entry point by $1,950.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $192,390 and $190,245 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW X7 by roughly $10,685 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The BMW X7 features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the RAM 2500 gets a 12-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The BMW X7 stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the RAM 2500. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the BMW X7 gets vernasca leather upholstery while the RAM 2500 offers leather.
Drivetrain
The BMW X7 uses a Diesel producing 259kW and 720Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.9 seconds.
The RAM 2500 responds with a Diesel Turbo making 276kW and 1152Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The RAM 2500 has the clear power advantage at 276kW vs 259kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW X7 is 2.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The BMW X7 measures 5,181mm long on a 3,105mm wheelbase, 885mm shorter than the RAM 2500 at 6,066mm (3,785mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the RAM 2500 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 750L in the BMW X7 and 900L in the RAM 2500, giving the RAM 2500 a 150L advantage. The BMW X7 seats 7 vs 6.
For towing, the RAM 2500 leads with a 8,000kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 4,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
13.1m to 14.4m
Based on 13.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 14.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the BMW X7 and $4,446/year for the RAM 2500. That is a $2,137 annual difference in favour of the BMW X7.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (BMW X7) vs $4,446 (RAM 2500). The BMW X7 saves you roughly $2,137 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X7) vs 3 years / 100,000km (RAM 2500). The BMW X7 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BMW X7 if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the RAM 2500 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer RAM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The RAM 2500 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The BMW X7 will save you roughly $2,137 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the RAM 2500 has a clear edge. The BMW X7 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, BMW X7 and RAM 2500?
The RAM 2500 is the cheapest at $172,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW X7 by $1,950.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BMW X7 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of BMW X7 and RAM 2500 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The RAM 2500 has the largest boot at 900L.
Which can tow the most?
The RAM 2500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 8,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The BMW X7 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The RAM 2500 makes the most power at 276kW. The BMW X7 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.9s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
