CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBYD Atto 2 vs Suzuki Jimny
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Atto 2 vs Suzuki Jimny

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBYDSuzuki
Price (RRP)$31,990$33,150
Fuel typeElectricPetrol
Range (WLTP)345km
Battery51.1 kWh
Power130kW75kW
0-100 km/h7.9s
Max DC Charge82kW
10-80% Charge Time40 min
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km
Boot Space380L85L
Towing1,300kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BYD Atto 2 & Suzuki Jimny

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BYD Atto 2 starts from $31,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Jimny opens at $33,150. That makes the BYD Atto 2 the more affordable entry point by $1,160.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,189 and $36,465 respectively.

The BYD Atto 2 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Suzuki Jimny, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

45.1kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

43 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 82kW · 0–80%

33 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 82kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Atto 2 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8.8-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Jimny gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the BYD Atto 2 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Suzuki Jimny offers fabric.

Drivetrain

The BYD Atto 2 uses a Electric producing 130kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.

The Suzuki Jimny responds with a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol, VVT making 75kW and 130Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving all four wheels.

The BYD Atto 2 has the clear power advantage at 130kW vs 75kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Atto 2 measures 4,310mm long on a 2,620mm wheelbase, 660mm longer than the Suzuki Jimny at 3,650mm (2,250mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 2 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the BYD Atto 2 and 85L in the Suzuki Jimny, giving the BYD Atto 2 a 295L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1320L vs 377L. The BYD Atto 2 seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.5m

TightestSuzuki Jimny LITETightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Jimny LITE
9.8mTighter
Best
BYD Atto 2 Dynamic
10.5m
Worst
BYD Atto 2 Dynamic
10.5m · Good

Based on 10.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Jimny LITE
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki JimnyTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
BYD Atto 210.5 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki JimnyTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 2) vs 5 years (Suzuki Jimny). The BYD Atto 2 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Atto 2 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Jimny if: You or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BYD Atto 2 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the BYD Atto 2 has a clear edge. The BYD Atto 2 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 2 and Suzuki Jimny?

The BYD Atto 2 is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Jimny by $1,160.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Jimny uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BYD Atto 2 and Suzuki Jimny carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BYD Atto 2 has the largest boot at 380L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki Jimny has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BYD Atto 2 has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Atto 2 makes the most power at 130kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs