CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Stockman vs Mitsubishi Triton
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Stockman vs Mitsubishi Triton

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMitsubishi
Price (RRP)TBC$43,690
Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Electric range100km
Power350kW150kW
0-100 km/h11.3s
Fuel Economy2 kWh/100km7.5 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Chery Stockman & Mitsubishi Triton

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Stockman stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Triton. The Mitsubishi Triton counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Stockman uses a 2.5L Turbo-Diesel Plug-in Hybrid (Super Hybrid) producing 350kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a 4WD layout.

The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.

The Chery Stockman has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Stockman measures 5,450mm long on a 3,250mm wheelbase, 130mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Stockman generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.4m diameter

Large

Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m
Mitsubishi Triton GLX 4x2
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $96/year for the Chery Stockman and $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $2,042 annual difference in favour of the Chery Stockman.

Estimated annual total: $96 (Chery Stockman) vs $2,138 (Mitsubishi Triton). The Chery Stockman saves you roughly $2,042 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Stockman) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Stockman if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Stockman takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Chery Stockman will save you roughly $2,042 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Stockman and Mitsubishi Triton?

The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Stockman uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Stockman has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Stockman makes the most power at 350kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. Our take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes