CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Stockman vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Stockman vs KGM Musso EV

Two electric Utes go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Chery Stockman: not on sale yet, so Chery hasn't published price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, transmission and turning circle, plus 4 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecCheryKGM
Price (RRP)TBC$60,000
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)420km
Battery34 kWh80.6 kWh
Electric range100km
Power350kW152kW
0-100 km/h10.9s
Max DC Charge300kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min
Fuel Economy2 kWh/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing3,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LNoYes

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Chery Stockman & KGM Musso EV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

34kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

80.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 17m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

16 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Stockman stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the KGM Musso EV. The KGM Musso EV counters with Apple CarPlay and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Stockman uses a 2.5T Turbo Diesel producing 350kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a 4WD layout.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 152kW and 339Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Chery Stockman has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 152kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 34kWh (Chery Stockman) vs 80.6kWh (KGM Musso EV).

Space & Comfort

The Chery Stockman measures 5,450mm long on a 3,250mm wheelbase, 290mm longer than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Stockman generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Chery Stockman leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m diameter

Large

KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
KGM Musso EV Turning circle · Ø 12.2 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Stockman) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Stockman)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Stockman if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Chery Stockman and KGM Musso EV trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Stockman and KGM Musso EV?

The KGM Musso EV is the cheapest at $60,000 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Stockman uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Chery Stockman and KGM Musso EV carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Stockman has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Stockman makes the most power at 350kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia