Chery Stockman vs Mazda BT-50
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 24 Oct 2026, price 4 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Chery Stockman: not on sale yet, so Chery hasn't published price, 0-100km/h, turning circle, electric range and energy consumption.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
No price
- no option data for this car
$38,400RRP
- cannot be matched: Satellite Navigation, Heated Front Seats and Electric Driver Seat not offered
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Chery Stockman & Mazda BT-50
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
We hold no ANCAP data for the Chery Stockman. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.
Recalls on our record
Chery Stockman
None open on our record
Mazda BT-50
- REC-006284 · published 3 Mar 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the left leaf spring bracket may have been insufficiently welded and could crack resulting in a loss of vehicle control.Year range on the notice: 2024
- REC-005070 · published 10 Mar 2022Due to a manufacturing issue, the transfer case blanking plug may not have been installed correctly during production.Year range on the notice: 2021
- REC-000899 · published 20 Jan 2021The rear seat belt pretensioner connector lock, may not have been installed correctly during vehicle assembly and will not tension properly.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021
- 11 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
34kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 70kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 70kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Stockman features a 15.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Stockman stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda BT-50. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Stockman gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mazda BT-50 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Stockman and 1-zone in the Mazda BT-50.
Drivetrain
The Chery Stockman uses a 2.5T Turbo Diesel producing 350kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through a dedicated hybrid transmission (4dht) to a 4WD layout.
The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.
The Chery Stockman has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Stockman measures 5,450mm long on a 3,250mm wheelbase, 130mm longer than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Stockman generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,495kg. That 5kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.5m diameter
Large
Based on 12.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $53/year for the Chery Stockman and $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50. That is a $1,914 annual difference in favour of the Chery Stockman.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Stockman) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). The Chery Stockman has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Stockman)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Stockman if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Mazda BT-50: Top CarSorted Score, 75 vs 61
The Mazda BT-50 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 61), taking 1 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Mazda BT-50 ahead by 74), safety (Mazda BT-50 ahead by 22), performance (Chery Stockman ahead by 22). The Chery Stockman will save you roughly $1,914 a year in fuel. The Chery Stockman adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Stockman and Mazda BT-50?
The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $38,400 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Stockman uses the least fuel at 1.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Mazda BT-50 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating (tested 2022). We hold no ANCAP data for Chery Stockman, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Stockman has the longest warranty at 7 years / unlimited km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Stockman makes the most power at 350kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
