Chery Stockman vs Ford Ranger
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Chery Stockman
Price TBC
Ute
Plug-in Hybrid
2.5T Turbo Diesel
350kW
2 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Ford Ranger
From $37,130
Ute
Diesel
Diesel Turbo
125kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Chery Stockman: not on sale yet, so Chery hasn't published price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, transmission and turning circle, plus 4 others.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Chery Stockman & Ford Ranger
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
34kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Stockman stands out with wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Ranger. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Chery Stockman uses a 2.5T Turbo Diesel producing 350kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a 4WD layout.
The Ford Ranger responds with a Diesel Turbo making 125kW and 405Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Chery Stockman has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Stockman measures 5,450mm long on a 3,250mm wheelbase, 225mm longer than the Ford Ranger at 5,225mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Ford Ranger leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.9m diameter
Large
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 11.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $96/year for the Chery Stockman and $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger. That is a $1,871 annual difference in favour of the Chery Stockman.
Estimated annual total: $96 (Chery Stockman) vs $1,967 (Ford Ranger). The Chery Stockman saves you roughly $1,871 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years (Chery Stockman) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger). The Chery Stockman has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Stockman)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Stockman if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Stockman takes 3 of 3 key spec categories. The Chery Stockman will save you roughly $1,871 a year in fuel. The Chery Stockman adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Stockman and Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Stockman uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Ranger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Stockman has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Stockman has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Stockman makes the most power at 350kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
