CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Stockman vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Stockman vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Chery Stockman: not on sale yet, so Chery hasn't published price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, transmission and turning circle, plus 4 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecCheryToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$65,690
Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Battery34 kWh
Electric range100km
Power350kW150kW
0-100 km/h12s
Fuel Economy2 kWh/100km9.6 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Chery Stockman & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

34kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Chery Stockman stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Stockman uses a 2.5T Turbo Diesel producing 350kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a 4WD layout.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

The Chery Stockman has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Stockman measures 5,450mm long on a 3,250mm wheelbase, 215mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 5,235mm (3,180mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Stockman generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.4m diameter

Large

Toyota LandCruiser 70 Single Cab Chassis Workmate
14.4m
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Single Cab Chassis Workmate
14.4m · Large

Based on 14.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.4 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Turning circle · Ø 14.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 13.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $96/year for the Chery Stockman and $2,736/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $2,640 annual difference in favour of the Chery Stockman.

Estimated annual total: $96 (Chery Stockman) vs $2,736 (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Chery Stockman saves you roughly $2,640 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years (Chery Stockman) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Chery Stockman has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Stockman)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Stockman if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Stockman takes 3 of 3 key spec categories. The Chery Stockman will save you roughly $2,640 a year in fuel. The Chery Stockman adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Stockman and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $65,690 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Stockman uses the least fuel at 2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Chery Stockman and Toyota LandCruiser 70 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Stockman has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Stockman has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Stockman makes the most power at 350kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia