CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Chery Stockman vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Stockman vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 24 Oct 2026, price 5 Nov 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Chery StockmanUltimate AWD11?01
Toyota LandCruiser 70Wagon WorkMate Auto8?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Chery Stockman: not on sale yet, so Chery hasn't published price, 0-100km/h, turning circle, electric range and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecCheryToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$75,600
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no option data for this car

$75,600RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Battery34 kWh—
Electric range96km—
Power350kW150kW
0-100 km/h—12s
Max DC Charge70kW—
Fuel Economy1.1 kWh/100km10.6 L/100km
Towing3,495kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNot rated by ANCAP

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Chery Stockman & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

We hold no ANCAP data for the Chery Stockman. ANCAP's published record does not give the Toyota LandCruiser 70 a rating. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.

Recalls on our record

Chery Stockman

None open on our record

Toyota LandCruiser 70

  • REC-005079 · published 5 Jul 2016The front fender bracket may fail causing the front fender to become loose.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

34kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

33 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 70kW · 0–80%

29 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 70kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Stockman features a 15.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Stockman stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. The Toyota LandCruiser 70 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Stockman gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Stockman and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Drivetrain

The Chery Stockman uses a 2.5T Turbo Diesel producing 350kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through a dedicated hybrid transmission (4dht) to a 4WD layout.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

The Chery Stockman has the clear power advantage at 350kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Stockman measures 5,450mm long on a 3,250mm wheelbase, 585mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Stockman generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,495kg. That 5kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.6m diameter

Large

Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m
←
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.6 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Turning circle · Ø 12.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 11.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $53/year for the Chery Stockman and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $2,968 annual difference in favour of the Chery Stockman.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Stockman) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The Chery Stockman has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Stockman)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Stockman if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Chery Stockman: Top CarSorted Score, 61 vs 60

The Chery Stockman comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (61 vs 60), taking 2 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Toyota LandCruiser 70 ahead by 40), performance (Chery Stockman ahead by 28), value (Chery Stockman ahead by 18). The Chery Stockman will save you roughly $2,968 a year in fuel. The Chery Stockman adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Stockman and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 is the cheapest at $75,600 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Stockman uses the least fuel at 1.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

ANCAP's published record does not give a rating to Toyota LandCruiser 70, and we hold no ANCAP data for Chery Stockman, so there is no crash result to compare.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Stockman has the longest warranty at 7 years / unlimited km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Stockman makes the most power at 350kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Wagons · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars