CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs GWM Cannon
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs GWM Cannon

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGWM
Price (RRP)$38,990$39,490
Power180kW120kW
0-100 km/h8.5s10.5s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km8 L/100km
Boot Space550L
Towing2,000kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $38,990 before on-road costs, while the GWM Cannon opens at $39,490. That makes the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,889 and $43,439 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Cannon hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 84% for the GWM Cannon.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 6 in the GWM Cannon.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Cannon gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and Sony audio that you will not find on the GWM Cannon. The GWM Cannon counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The GWM Cannon responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 620mm shorter than the GWM Cannon at 5,340mm (3,200mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Cannon generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the GWM Cannon leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 13.0m

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8mTighter
Best
GWM Cannon Premium
13.0m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Cannon
13.0m · Large

Based on 13.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $2,280/year for the GWM Cannon. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the GWM Cannon.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $2,280 (GWM Cannon). The GWM Cannon saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Cannon). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Cannon if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Cannon will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Cannon?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is the cheapest at $38,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Cannon by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Cannon uses the least fuel at 8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Cannon all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Cannon has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Utes