CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCitroen C4 Cactus vs Mazda Mazda2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Citroen C4 Cactus vs Mazda Mazda2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCitroenMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$20,495
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power81kW76kW
0-100 km/h9.3s
Fuel Economy4.7 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space358L250L
Towing825kg700kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Citroen C4 Cactus & Mazda Mazda2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

Drivetrain

The Citroen C4 Cactus uses a 1.2 PureTech turbo petrol with stop-start producing 81kW and 205Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda2 responds with a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT making 76kW and 135Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Citroen C4 Cactus has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 76kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Citroen C4 Cactus measures 4,157mm long on a 2,595mm wheelbase, 257mm longer than the Mazda Mazda2 at 3,900mm (2,490mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Citroen C4 Cactus generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Citroen C4 Cactus and 250L in the Mazda Mazda2, giving the Citroen C4 Cactus a 108L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1170L vs 469L.

For towing, the Citroen C4 Cactus leads with a 825kg braked capacity vs 700kg. That 125kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.9m

TightestMazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 ManualTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8mTighter
Best
Citroen C4 Cactus Exclusive PureTech 110 S&S manual
10.9m
Worst
Citroen C4 Cactus Exclusive PureTech 110 S&S manual
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda Mazda2Tightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Citroen C4 Cactus10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda2Tightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,340/year for the Citroen C4 Cactus and $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Citroen C4 Cactus.

Estimated annual total: $1,340 (Citroen C4 Cactus) vs $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2). The Citroen C4 Cactus saves you roughly $484 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Citroen C4 Cactus) vs 3 years (Mazda Mazda2). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Citroen C4 Cactus if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Citroen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Citroen C4 Cactus takes 4 of 4 key spec categories. The Citroen C4 Cactus will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Citroen C4 Cactus has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Citroen C4 Cactus and Mazda Mazda2?

The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $20,495 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Citroen C4 Cactus uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda Mazda2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Citroen C4 Cactus has the largest boot at 358L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Citroen C4 Cactus makes the most power at 81kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars