CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCUPRA Formentor vs Mazda CX-90
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

CUPRA Formentor vs Mazda CX-90

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCUPRAMazda
Price (RRP)$49,990$74,385
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW254kW
0-100 km/h7s7.8s
Fuel Economy5.5 L/100km8.2 L/100km
Boot Space420L257L
Towing1,500kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the CUPRA Formentor & Mazda CX-90

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The CUPRA Formentor starts from $49,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-90 opens at $74,385. That makes the CUPRA Formentor the more affordable entry point by $24,395.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,989 and $81,824 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the CUPRA Formentor by roughly $3,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 93% for the CUPRA Formentor and 91% for the Mazda CX-90.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Formentor packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mazda CX-90.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the CUPRA Formentor and 10 in the Mazda CX-90.

Feature Showdown

The CUPRA Formentor features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-90 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Formentor stands out with heated front seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-90. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the CUPRA Formentor gets cloth upholstery while the Mazda CX-90 offers leather.

Drivetrain

The CUPRA Formentor uses a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-90 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the CUPRA Formentor is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The CUPRA Formentor measures 4,450mm long on a 2,680mm wheelbase, 670mm shorter than the Mazda CX-90 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 420L in the CUPRA Formentor and 257L in the Mazda CX-90, giving the CUPRA Formentor a 163L advantage. The Mazda CX-90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-90 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m to 10.8m

CUPRA Formentor S
10.7mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
10.8m
Worst
CUPRA Formentor S
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-90 G50e Touring
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the CUPRA Formentor and $2,337/year for the Mazda CX-90. That is a $769 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Formentor.

Estimated annual total: $1,568 (CUPRA Formentor) vs $2,337 (Mazda CX-90). The CUPRA Formentor saves you roughly $769 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Formentor) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-90). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the CUPRA Formentor if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-90 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CUPRA Formentor takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The CUPRA Formentor will save you roughly $769 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the CUPRA Formentor has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-90?

The CUPRA Formentor is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-90 by $24,395.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The CUPRA Formentor uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-90 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The CUPRA Formentor has the largest boot at 420L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-90 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-90 makes the most power at 254kW. The CUPRA Formentor is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs