CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCUPRA Terramar vs Renault Scenic E-Tech
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

CUPRA Terramar vs Renault Scenic E-Tech

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCUPRARenault
Price (RRP)$53,990$55,990
Range (WLTP)588km
Battery60 kWh
Power110kW125kW
0-100 km/h9.3s8.4s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy5.7 L/100km
Boot Space508L545L
Towing1,800kg1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The CUPRA Terramar starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Renault Scenic E-Tech opens at $55,990. That makes the CUPRA Terramar the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $61,589 respectively.

The Renault Scenic E-Tech qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The CUPRA Terramar, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the CUPRA Terramar and Renault Scenic E-Tech hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the CUPRA Terramar and 88% for the Renault Scenic E-Tech.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Terramar packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 7 in the Renault Scenic E-Tech.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the CUPRA Terramar and 7 in the Renault Scenic E-Tech.

Feature Showdown

The CUPRA Terramar features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Renault Scenic E-Tech gets a 12-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Terramar stands out with heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Renault Scenic E-Tech. The Renault Scenic E-Tech counters with wireless charging and BOSE audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The CUPRA Terramar uses a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.

The Renault Scenic E-Tech responds with a Electric making 125kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Renault Scenic E-Tech has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Renault Scenic E-Tech is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The CUPRA Terramar measures 4,519mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 49mm longer than the Renault Scenic E-Tech at 4,470mm (2,785mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Scenic E-Tech generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 508L in the CUPRA Terramar and 545L in the Renault Scenic E-Tech, giving the Renault Scenic E-Tech a 37L advantage.

For towing, the CUPRA Terramar leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

Renault Scenic E-Tech Techno EV60
11.0mTighter
Best
CUPRA Terramar S
11.4m
Worst
CUPRA Terramar
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Scenic E-Tech
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Scenic E-Tech). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Scenic E-Tech if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Scenic E-Tech takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Renault Scenic E-Tech has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, CUPRA Terramar and Renault Scenic E-Tech?

The CUPRA Terramar is the cheapest at $53,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Scenic E-Tech by $2,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The CUPRA Terramar uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — CUPRA Terramar and Renault Scenic E-Tech all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Scenic E-Tech has the largest boot at 545L.

Which can tow the most?

The CUPRA Terramar has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Scenic E-Tech makes the most power at 125kW. The Renault Scenic E-Tech is quickest to 100km/h in 8.4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs