CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord EcoSport vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford EcoSport vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$45,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power90.5kW143kW
0-100 km/h8.4s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km4.5 L/100km
Boot Space743L705L
Towing900kg800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford EcoSport & Toyota RAV4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford EcoSport features a 6.5-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota RAV4 gets a 10.5-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford EcoSport stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota RAV4. The Toyota RAV4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford EcoSport uses a 1.5L Dragon petrol (3-cylinder) producing 90.5kW and 150Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol Hybrid making 143kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt (e-cvt) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 has the clear power advantage at 143kW vs 90.5kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford EcoSport measures 4,325mm long on a 2,519mm wheelbase, 275mm shorter than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,600mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota RAV4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 743L in the Ford EcoSport and 705L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Ford EcoSport a 38L advantage.

For towing, the Ford EcoSport leads with a 900kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m to 11.4m

TightestFord EcoSport Ambiente 1.5LTightest turn at 10.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford EcoSport Ambiente 1.5L
10.7mTighter
Best
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m
Worst
Ford EcoSport Ambiente 1.5L
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord EcoSportTightest turn at 10.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford EcoSportTightest10.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota RAV411.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford EcoSport and $1,283/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Toyota RAV4.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Ford EcoSport) vs $1,283 (Toyota RAV4). The Toyota RAV4 saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford EcoSport) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota RAV4). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford EcoSport if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ford EcoSport and Toyota RAV4 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota RAV4 will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford EcoSport has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford EcoSport and Toyota RAV4?

The Toyota RAV4 is the cheapest at $45,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota RAV4 uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford EcoSport all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford EcoSport has the largest boot at 743L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota RAV4 makes the most power at 143kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars