CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord EcoSport vs Toyota Kluger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford EcoSport vs Toyota Kluger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$62,410
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power90.5kW184kW
0-100 km/h7.9s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km5.6 L/100km
Boot Space743L241L
Towing900kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Ford EcoSport & Toyota Kluger

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford EcoSport and Toyota Kluger hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Kluger packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Ford EcoSport.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

The Ford EcoSport features a 6.5-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Ford EcoSport uses a 1.5L Dragon petrol (3-cylinder) producing 90.5kW and 150Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 90.5kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford EcoSport measures 4,325mm long on a 2,519mm wheelbase, 641mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Kluger generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 743L in the Ford EcoSport and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the Ford EcoSport a 502L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Kluger leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 900kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m to 11.4m

TightestFord EcoSport Ambiente 1.5LTightest turn at 10.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford EcoSport Ambiente 1.5L
10.7mTighter
Best
Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m
Worst
Ford EcoSport Ambiente 1.5L
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord EcoSportTightest turn at 10.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford EcoSportTightest10.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Kluger11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford EcoSport and $1,596/year for the Toyota Kluger. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Kluger.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Ford EcoSport) vs $1,596 (Toyota Kluger). The Toyota Kluger saves you roughly $371 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford EcoSport) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford EcoSport if: You need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Kluger takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Toyota Kluger will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford EcoSport has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford EcoSport and Toyota Kluger?

The Toyota Kluger is the cheapest at $62,410 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Kluger uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford EcoSport and Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford EcoSport has the largest boot at 743L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Kluger has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Kluger makes the most power at 184kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars