CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Everest vs Kia K2900
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Kia K2900

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Kia K2900: we're still completing price, length, width, height and kerb weight, plus 6 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordKia
Price (RRP)$68,990TBC
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power184kW92kW
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km10.2 L/100km
Boot Space259L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 130k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Everest & Kia K2900

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Kia K2900. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Kia K2900 responds with a 2.9L Turbo-diesel CRDi making 92kW and 245Nm, paired to its gearbox.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 92kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.8m

TightestKia K2900 Cab ChassisTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia K2900 Cab Chassis
10.0mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia K2900 Cab Chassis
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia K2900Tightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Kia K2900Tightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $2,907/year for the Kia K2900. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 130,000km (Kia K2900). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia K2900 if: You or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Everest takes 2 of 2 key spec categories. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Kia K2900?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Kia K2900, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Cab Chassiss · Best mid-size SUVs · Best family cars