CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Everest vs Mercedes-Benz M-Class
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Mercedes-Benz M-Class

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 13 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Ford EverestSport9?03
Mercedes-Benz M-ClassML 63 AMG7?05

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

Specifications in progress

Mercedes-Benz M-Class: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 7 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$68,990TBC
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$68,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

No price

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power184kW386kW
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km11.8 L/100km
Boot (seats up)259L—
Towing3,500kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Everest & Mercedes-Benz M-Class

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Ford Everest

  • REC-006683 · published 28 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2020
  • REC-006659 · published 13 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
  • REC-006541 · published 12 Feb 2026Due to a software issue, under certain circumstances if the battery level drops below a critical threshold, the transmission may shift into Park when the vehicle is travelling at speeds below 6 km/h.Year range on the notice: 2022
  • 12 more on the model page.

Mercedes-Benz M-Class

  • REC-005622 · published 16 Feb 2023Due to a manufacturing defect, water could come into contact with the fuel pump control unit.Year range on the notice: 2012 - 2018
  • REC-005438 · published 17 May 2022The sealing of the brake booster may reduce due to corrosion.Year range on the notice: 2005 - 2013
  • REC-000917 · published 7 Sep 2018Oil foam may develop in the system's oil reservoir under dynamic operating conditions if the oil is below the minimum level.Year range on the notice: 2012 - 2016
  • 2 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging — features our data doesn't list for the Mercedes-Benz M-Class. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Everest gets leather upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz M-Class offers designo leather (single-tone).

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Mercedes-Benz M-Class responds with a Petrol Turbo making 386kW and 700Nm, paired to a amg speedshift plus 7g-tronic driving all four wheels.

The Mercedes-Benz M-Class has the clear power advantage at 386kW vs 184kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
←
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Ford Everest Turning circle · Ø 11.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $3,363/year for the Mercedes-Benz M-Class. That is a $940 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz M-Class if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Ford Everest: Top CarSorted Score, 75 vs 53

The Ford Everest comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 53), taking 1 of 2 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: practicality (Ford Everest ahead by 36), fuel economy (Ford Everest ahead by 30), safety (Ford Everest ahead by 25). The Ford Everest will save you roughly $940 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Mercedes-Benz M-Class?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mercedes-Benz M-Class, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz M-Class makes the most power at 386kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs