CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Everest vs Renault Captur
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Renault Captur

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Renault Captur: we're still completing price, ground clearance and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordRenault
Price (RRP)$68,990TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power184kW113kW
0-100 km/h8.6s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space259L422L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Ford Everest & Renault Captur

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Everest and Renault Captur hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Ford Everest and 96% for the Renault Captur.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Everest, against 4 on the Renault Captur.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control. Airbag count is 9 in the Ford Everest and 6 in the Renault Captur.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Renault Captur gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Renault Captur. The Renault Captur counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Renault Captur responds with a 1.3 TCe 155 EDC making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic (edc) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 113kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 757mm longer than the Renault Captur at 4,221mm (2,639mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 422L in the Renault Captur, giving the Renault Captur a 163L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.8m

TightestRenault Captur Zen TCe 155Tightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Captur Zen TCe 155
11.1mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Captur Zen TCe 155
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault CapturTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Renault CapturTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $1,881/year for the Renault Captur. That is a $542 annual difference in favour of the Renault Captur.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Captur). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Captur if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Captur takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Renault Captur will save you roughly $542 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Captur has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Renault Captur?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Captur uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Ford Everest and Renault Captur all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Captur has the largest boot at 422L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs