CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Everest vs Volkswagen Arteon
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Volkswagen Arteon

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Arteon: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, body style and warranty, plus 2 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$68,990TBC
Fuel typeDieselPremium unleaded
Power184kW206kW
0-100 km/h—5.6s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space259L563L
Towing3,500kg—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Everest & Volkswagen Arteon

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Arteon gets a 9.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and ventilated seats — features our data doesn't list for the Volkswagen Arteon. The Volkswagen Arteon counters with Apple CarPlay, head-up display and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Volkswagen Arteon responds with a 4 cylinder inline turbo petrol with engine Start/Stop system making 206kW and 350Nm, paired to a 7 speed dsg driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.6 seconds.

The Volkswagen Arteon has the clear power advantage at 206kW vs 184kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 116mm longer than the Volkswagen Arteon at 4,862mm (2,837mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 563L in the Volkswagen Arteon, giving the Volkswagen Arteon a 304L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.7m to 11.8m

TightestVolkswagen Arteon 206TSI R-LineTightest turn at 11.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Arteon 206TSI R-Line
11.7mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Arteon 206TSI R-Line
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen ArteonTightest turn at 11.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Volkswagen ArteonTightest11.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $2,138/year for the Volkswagen Arteon. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Arteon.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Arteon if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volkswagen Arteon takes 3 of 3 key spec categories. The Volkswagen Arteon will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Arteon has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Volkswagen Arteon?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Arteon uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volkswagen Arteon, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Arteon has the largest boot at 563L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Arteon makes the most power at 206kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best family cars