Ford F-150 vs Volkswagen Amarok
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 22 Jul 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$114,950RRP
- no option data for this car
$55,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Ford F-150 & Volkswagen Amarok
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford F-150 starts from $114,950 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Amarok opens at $55,990. That makes the Volkswagen Amarok the more affordable entry point by $58,960.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $126,445 and $61,589 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen Amarok by roughly $6,415 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Ford F-150
- REC-006698 · published 17 Aug 2026Due to a software issue the Powertrain Control Module may not provide warnings from a faulty Intake Air Temperature sensor to the On-Board Diagnostics system.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2022
- REC-006590 · published 22 Apr 2026Due to a software defect, the Trailer Module (TRM) may lose communication with the vehicle when a trailer is connected.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2026
- REC-006497 · published 10 Dec 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, moisture may enter the ARB Solis lights wiring harness causing corrosion.Year range on the notice: 2019 - 2025
- 13 more on the model page.
Volkswagen Amarok
- REC-006441 · published 30 Sep 2025Due to a software issue, the electromechanical brake servo control unit may switch off.Year range on the notice: 2025
- REC-006190 · published 26 Nov 2024Due to a manufacturing defect, the driver's seat belt may have been incorrectly anchored.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2024
- REC-005838 · published 30 Nov 2023Due to a manufacturing defect, the rear driveshaft bolts may not have been sufficiently tightened during production and could become loose and detach.Year range on the notice: 2023
- 4 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Ford F-150 features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 12-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Amarok gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Ford F-150 uses a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) producing 298kW and 678Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a 4WD layout.
The Volkswagen Amarok responds with a Diesel making 125kW and 405Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels.
The Ford F-150 has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford F-150 measures 5,894mm long on a 3,694mm wheelbase, 544mm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok at 5,350mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Ford F-150 leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.8m to 14.6m
Based on 14.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,563/year for the Ford F-150 and $2,280/year for the Volkswagen Amarok. That is a $1,283 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Amarok.
Warranty: 5 years (Ford F-150) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Amarok). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford F-150 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volkswagen Amarok if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Volkswagen Amarok: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 58
The Volkswagen Amarok comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 58), taking 2 of 4 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Volkswagen Amarok ahead by 41), safety (Volkswagen Amarok ahead by 31), value (Volkswagen Amarok ahead by 29). The Volkswagen Amarok will save you roughly $1,283 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford F-150 and Volkswagen Amarok?
The Volkswagen Amarok is the cheapest at $55,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford F-150 by $58,960.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volkswagen Amarok uses the least fuel at 8L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Volkswagen Amarok holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Ford F-150, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford F-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford F-150 makes the most power at 298kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
