Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 23 Oct 2026, price 4 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Ford Mustang Mach-E: we're still completing kerb weight, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
$65,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$83,600RRP
- with the Ford Mustang Mach-E's standard kit: $83,600 (nothing to add)
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Ford Mustang Mach-E & Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $65,990 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque opens at $83,600. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $17,610.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,589 and $91,960 respectively.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Ford Mustang Mach-E
- REC-006732 · published 28 Sep 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the rear quarter glass trim moulding may detach from the vehicle while driving.Year range on the notice: 2023
- REC-006675 · published 23 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing issue, the rear differential pinion shaft could break, resulting in a loss of motive power or loss of the park function when the vehicle is stationary.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2023
- REC-006648 · published 1 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, Advanced Driver Assistance System may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
- 6 more on the model page.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
- REC-006404 · published 7 Aug 2025Due to a software issue, the high voltage battery may discharge when driving in EV mode.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2025
- REC-006380 · published 22 Jul 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the passenger airbag may tear during deployment.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024
- REC-005917 · published 14 Mar 2024Due to manufacturing defect, the engine turbocharger oil delivery pipe may not have been sufficiently tightened.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024
- 10 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
73kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 150kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with Bang & Olufsen audio — features our data doesn't list for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque counters with head-up display, Meridian audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Mustang Mach-E gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers grained leather.
Drivetrain
The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 212kW and 525Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque responds with a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol making 184kW and 365Nm, paired to a 9-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.6 seconds.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 212kW vs 184kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,728mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 357mm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque at 4,371mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a 70L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m diameter
Average
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.4 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
2.0 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Ford Mustang Mach-E: Top CarSorted Score, 72 vs 66
The Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (72 vs 66), taking 3 of 4 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: safety (Ford Mustang Mach-E ahead by 21), practicality (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque ahead by 13), value (Ford Mustang Mach-E ahead by 12). If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $65,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque by $17,610.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses the least fuel at 8.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the largest boot at 472L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 212kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
