CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes-Benz GLC
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes-Benz GLC

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 27 Sep 2026, price 4 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD9?03
Mercedes-Benz GLCGLC200 4MATIC0?012

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecFordMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$65,990$89,900
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$65,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$89,900RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeElectricPetrol
Range (WLTP)470km—
Battery73 kWh—
Power212kW150kW
0-100 km/h7s8.2s
Max DC Charge150kW—
10-80% Charge Time28 min—
Fuel Economy—7.5 L/100km
Boot (seats up)402L600L
Towing—2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Ford Mustang Mach-E & Mercedes-Benz GLC

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $65,990 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz GLC opens at $89,900. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $23,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $72,589 and $98,890 respectively.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz GLC does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz GLC hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 92% for the Mercedes-Benz GLC.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 8 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Mustang Mach-E, against 0 on the Mercedes-Benz GLC.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Recalls on our record

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • REC-006732 · published 28 Sep 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the rear quarter glass trim moulding may detach from the vehicle while driving.Year range on the notice: 2023
  • REC-006675 · published 23 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing issue, the rear differential pinion shaft could break, resulting in a loss of motive power or loss of the park function when the vehicle is stationary.Year range on the notice: 2021 - 2023
  • REC-006648 · published 1 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, Advanced Driver Assistance System may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
  • 6 more on the model page.

Mercedes-Benz GLC

  • REC-006695 · published 12 Aug 2026Nine model lines: door lock defect (campaign RC5219)Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2026
  • REC-006414 · published 29 Aug 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering coupling bolts may not meet specifications and could become loose.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2025
  • REC-006318 · published 28 Mar 2025Due to a software issue, the high-voltage starter generator may experience an intermittent overload, which could deactivate functions of the system.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2025
  • 26 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

73kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 10m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 150kW · 0–80%

29 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz GLC gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio — features our data doesn't list for the Mercedes-Benz GLC. The Mercedes-Benz GLC counters with head-up display and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 212kW and 525Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz GLC responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 320Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 212kW vs 150kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 1.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,713mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 3mm shorter than the Mercedes-Benz GLC at 4,716mm (2,888mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 600L in the Mercedes-Benz GLC, giving the Mercedes-Benz GLC a 198L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.9m diameter

Average

Mercedes-Benz GLC GLC200 4MATIC
11.9m
←
Mercedes-Benz GLC GLC200 4MATIC
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.9 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Mercedes-Benz GLC Turning circle · Ø 11.9 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.5 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz GLC). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz GLC if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (72 vs 62). The Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz GLC trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz GLC has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz GLC?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $65,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz GLC by $23,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz GLC uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz GLC all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz GLC has the largest boot at 600L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz GLC has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 212kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best hybrid cars