CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mustang vs Honda Civic
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang vs Honda Civic

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordHonda
Price (RRP)$72,990$43,250
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power232kW135kW
0-100 km/h5.6s8.1s
Fuel Economy9.4 L/100km4.2 L/100km
Boot Space408L410L
Towing750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Ford Mustang & Honda Civic

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang starts from $72,990 before on-road costs, while the Honda Civic opens at $43,250. That makes the Honda Civic the more affordable entry point by $29,740.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,289 and $47,575 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda Civic by roughly $7,410 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Mustang features a 13.2-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.4-inch digital dash, while the Honda Civic gets a 9-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mustang stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Honda Civic. The Honda Civic counters with Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang uses a Petrol I4 Turbo producing 232kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.6 seconds.

The Honda Civic responds with a Hybrid making 135kW and 315Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The Ford Mustang has the clear power advantage at 232kW vs 135kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Mustang is 2.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang measures 4,811mm long on a 2,719mm wheelbase, 251mm longer than the Honda Civic at 4,560mm (2,733mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda Civic generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 408L in the Ford Mustang and 410L in the Honda Civic, giving the Honda Civic a 2L advantage. The Honda Civic seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.5m

TightestHonda Civic e:HEV LTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Honda Civic e:HEV L
11.4mTighter
Best
Ford Mustang EcoBoost Fastback
11.5m
Worst
Ford Mustang EcoBoost Fastback
11.5m · Average

Based on 11.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Honda Civic e:HEV L
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHonda CivicTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Mustang11.5 m
Average△ 3-point
Honda CivicTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,679/year for the Ford Mustang and $1,197/year for the Honda Civic. That is a $1,482 annual difference in favour of the Honda Civic.

Estimated annual total: $2,679 (Ford Mustang) vs $1,197 (Honda Civic). The Honda Civic saves you roughly $1,482 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford Mustang) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda Civic). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda Civic).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Honda Civic if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Honda Civic takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Honda Civic will save you roughly $1,482 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang and Honda Civic?

The Honda Civic is the cheapest at $43,250 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Mustang by $29,740.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Honda Civic uses the least fuel at 4.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Honda Civic all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Honda Civic has the largest boot at 410L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mustang makes the most power at 232kW. The Ford Mustang is quickest to 100km/h in 5.6s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Fastbacks · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars