CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Ranger Super Duty vs Nissan Navara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Ranger Super Duty vs Nissan Navara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Ranger Super Duty: not on sale yet, so Ford hasn't published 0-100km/h, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordNissan
Price (RRP)$82,990$26,490
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power154kW122kW
Fuel Economy9.9 L/100km
Towing4,500kg1,588kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Ford Ranger Super Duty & Nissan Navara

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Ranger Super Duty starts from $82,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Navara opens at $26,490. That makes the Nissan Navara the more affordable entry point by $56,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $91,289 and $29,139 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Ford Ranger Super Duty stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the Nissan Navara. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Ranger Super Duty uses a 3.0L V6 turbo-diesel producing 154kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Nissan Navara lines up making 122kW and 238Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual (7-speed automatic optional) driving the rear wheels.

The Ford Ranger Super Duty has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 122kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Ranger Super Duty measures 5,470mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 215mm longer than the Nissan Navara at 5,255mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger Super Duty generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ford Ranger Super Duty leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 1,588kg. That 2,912kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 13.6m

TightestNissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2Tightest turn at 11.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2
11.8mTighter
Best
Ford Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-Chassis
13.6m
Worst
Ford Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-Chassis
13.6m · Large

Based on 13.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan NavaraTightest turn at 11.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Ranger Super Duty13.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Nissan NavaraTightest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford Ranger Super Duty) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan Navara). The Ford Ranger Super Duty has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Ranger Super Duty if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Navara if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Ranger Super Duty takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Ford Ranger Super Duty adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger Super Duty and Nissan Navara?

The Nissan Navara is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Ranger Super Duty by $56,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan Navara uses the least fuel at 9.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan Navara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty makes the most power at 154kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia