CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Transit vs Mercedes-Benz Vito
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Transit vs Mercedes-Benz Vito

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Vans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$69,990$63,000
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power121kW120kW
0-100 km/h12s
Fuel Economy8.2 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space9000L6000L
Towing3,500kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Ford Transit & Mercedes-Benz Vito

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Transit starts from $69,990 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz Vito opens at $63,000. That makes the Mercedes-Benz Vito the more affordable entry point by $6,990.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $76,989 and $69,300 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz Vito by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Ford Transit stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz Vito. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Transit uses a Diesel producing 121kW and 390Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz Vito lines up making 120kW and 380Nm, paired to a 9-speed automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Ford Transit has the clear power advantage at 121kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Transit measures 5,981mm long on a 3,750mm wheelbase, 841mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz Vito at 5,140mm (3,200mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Transit generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 9000L in the Ford Transit and 6000L in the Mercedes-Benz Vito, giving the Ford Transit a 3000L advantage. The Ford Transit seats 3 vs 2.

For towing, the Ford Transit leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m diameter

Average

Mercedes-Benz Vito Panel Van
11.1m
Mercedes-Benz Vito Panel Van
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Mercedes-Benz Vito Turning circle · Ø 11.1 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.2 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide — fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,337/year for the Ford Transit and $1,853/year for the Mercedes-Benz Vito. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz Vito.

Estimated annual total: $2,337 (Ford Transit) vs $1,853 (Mercedes-Benz Vito). The Mercedes-Benz Vito saves you roughly $484 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Transit) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Mercedes-Benz Vito). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Transit if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz Vito if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Transit takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mercedes-Benz Vito will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Transit has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Transit and Mercedes-Benz Vito?

The Mercedes-Benz Vito is the cheapest at $63,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Transit by $6,990.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz Vito uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Ford Transit and Mercedes-Benz Vito carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Transit has the largest boot at 9000L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Transit has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Transit makes the most power at 121kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Vans · Best family cars