FPV GT F 351 vs Subaru WRX
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
FPV GT F 351: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 5 others.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the FPV GT F 351 & Subaru WRX
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The FPV GT F 351 features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Subaru WRX gets a 11.6-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
The Subaru WRX counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and Harman Kardon audio that the FPV GT F 351 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the FPV GT F 351 gets leather upholstery while the Subaru WRX offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The FPV GT F 351 lines up producing 351kW and 570Nm of torque, sent through a tr6060 6-speed manual to a RWD layout.
The Subaru WRX responds with a Petrol making 202kW and 350Nm, paired to a manual driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.4 seconds.
The FPV GT F 351 has the clear power advantage at 351kW vs 202kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
Boot space is 535L in the FPV GT F 351 and 414L in the Subaru WRX, giving the FPV GT F 351 a 121L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m diameter
Average
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.8 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,876/year for the FPV GT F 351 and $2,822/year for the Subaru WRX. That is a $1,054 annual difference in favour of the Subaru WRX.
Estimated annual total: $3,876 (FPV GT F 351) vs $2,822 (Subaru WRX). The Subaru WRX saves you roughly $1,054 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the FPV GT F 351 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer FPV's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Subaru WRX if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The FPV GT F 351 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Subaru WRX will save you roughly $1,054 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the FPV GT F 351 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, FPV GT F 351 and Subaru WRX?
The Subaru WRX is the cheapest at $48,890 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Subaru WRX uses the least fuel at 9.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of FPV GT F 351 and Subaru WRX carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The FPV GT F 351 has the largest boot at 535L.
Which can tow the most?
The FPV GT F 351 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The FPV GT F 351 makes the most power at 351kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
