FPV GT F 351 vs Toyota Camry
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
FPV GT F 351: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 5 others.
Toyota Camry: we're still completing length, 0-100km/h, warranty, ground clearance and turning circle, plus 3 others.
Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the FPV GT F 351 & Toyota Camry
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The FPV GT F 351 features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Camry gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
Drivetrain
The FPV GT F 351 lines up producing 351kW and 570Nm of torque, sent through a tr6060 6-speed manual to a RWD layout.
The Toyota Camry lines up making 133kW and 231Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic transmission with sequential shift driving the front wheels.
The FPV GT F 351 has the clear power advantage at 351kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
Boot space is 535L in the FPV GT F 351 and 493L in the Toyota Camry, giving the FPV GT F 351 a 42L advantage.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the FPV GT F 351 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer FPV's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota Camry if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The FPV GT F 351 takes 2 of 2 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the FPV GT F 351 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, FPV GT F 351 and Toyota Camry?
The Toyota Camry is the cheapest at $27,690 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The FPV GT F 351 uses the least fuel at 13.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota Camry all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The FPV GT F 351 has the largest boot at 535L.
Which can tow the most?
The FPV GT F 351 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The FPV GT F 351 makes the most power at 351kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
