CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›GAC Emzoom vs Omoda 5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Emzoom vs Omoda 5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
GAC EmzoomLuxury9?03
Omoda 5FX8?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecGACOmoda
Price (RRP)$25,590$27,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$25,590RRP

  • no option data for this car

$27,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power130kW108kW
0-100 km/h7.8s10.5s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot (seats up)341L358L
Towing—1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyANCAP hasn't rated this model5 stars (2022)

Track the GAC Emzoom & Omoda 5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GAC Emzoom starts from $25,590 before on-road costs, while the Omoda 5 opens at $27,990. That makes the GAC Emzoom the more affordable entry point by $2,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,149 and $30,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP's published ratings include no record for the GAC Emzoom. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.

Recalls on our record

GAC Emzoom

None open on our record

Omoda 5

  • REC-005891 · published 8 Feb 2024Due to a manufacturing defect, the bolt securing the brake pipe union may not have been tightened sufficiently.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The GAC Emzoom features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Omoda 5 gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Omoda 5. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC Emzoom gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Omoda 5 offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the GAC Emzoom and 1-zone in the Omoda 5.

Drivetrain

The GAC Emzoom uses a Petrol Turbo producing 130kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The Omoda 5 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 130kW vs 108kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the GAC Emzoom is 2.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC Emzoom measures 4,410mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 103mm longer than the Omoda 5 at 4,307mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 341L in the GAC Emzoom and 358L in the Omoda 5, giving the Omoda 5 a 17L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestOmoda 5 FXTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Omoda 5 FX
10.6mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Omoda 5 FX
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestOmoda 5Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
GAC Emzoom11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Omoda 5Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom and $1,967/year for the Omoda 5. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the GAC Emzoom.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (Omoda 5).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Omoda 5 if: You need more boot space, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Omoda 5: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 70

The Omoda 5 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 70), taking 2 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Omoda 5 ahead by 27), performance (GAC Emzoom ahead by 15), practicality (Omoda 5 ahead by 12). The GAC Emzoom will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Emzoom and Omoda 5?

The GAC Emzoom is the cheapest at $25,590 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 5 by $2,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC Emzoom uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Omoda 5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating (tested 2022). ANCAP's published ratings include no record for GAC Emzoom, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Omoda 5 has the largest boot at 358L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 130kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs