CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Haval H7 vs Volkswagen T-Roc
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Haval H7 vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$46,990$44,990
Power179kW110kW
0-100 km/h7.9s9.1s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot Space520L392L
Towing2,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The GWM Haval H7 starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $44,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $49,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Haval H7 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval H7 stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Roc. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H7 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Roc offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The GWM Haval H7 uses a Petrol producing 179kW and 530Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The GWM Haval H7 has the clear power advantage at 179kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H7 is 1.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Haval H7 measures 4,760mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 509mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H7 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 520L in the GWM Haval H7 and 392L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the GWM Haval H7 a 128L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval H7 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.0m

Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
10.6mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H7 Vanta HEV
12.0m
Worst
GWM Haval H7
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen T-Roc
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the GWM Haval H7 and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H7.

Estimated annual total: $1,682 (GWM Haval H7) vs $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc). The GWM Haval H7 saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H7) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). The GWM Haval H7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Haval H7 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval H7 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories. The GWM Haval H7 will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H7 has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H7 and Volkswagen T-Roc?

The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H7 by $2,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval H7 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Haval H7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval H7 has the largest boot at 520L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Haval H7 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Haval H7 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Haval H7 makes the most power at 179kW. The GWM Haval H7 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs