CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 500 vs Mazda 6e
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 500 vs Mazda 6e

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMMazda
Price (RRP)$59,990$49,990
Range (WLTP)484km
Battery78 kWh
Power255kW190kW
0-100 km/h8.5s
Max DC Charge194kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km
Boot Space98L363L
Towing3,000kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 500 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda 6e opens at $49,990. That makes the Mazda 6e the more affordable entry point by $10,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $54,989 respectively.

The Mazda 6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 500, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Tank 500 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda 6e gets a 26.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Mazda 6e. The Mazda 6e counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 500 uses a Hybrid producing 255kW and 648Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Mazda 6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 190kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 500 measures 5,078mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 228mm longer than the Mazda 6e at 4,850mm (2,902mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 98L in the GWM Tank 500 and 363L in the Mazda 6e, giving the Mazda 6e a 265L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 795L vs 1434L. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 500 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

Mazda 6e GT
11.0mTighter
Best
GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2m
Worst
GWM Tank 500
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda 6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda 6e). The GWM Tank 500 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda 6e if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda 6e takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda 6e has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 500 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 500 and Mazda 6e?

The Mazda 6e is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 500 by $10,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Tank 500 uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 500 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda 6e has the largest boot at 363L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 500 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 500 makes the most power at 255kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Sedans