CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 500 vs Subaru Trailseeker
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 500 vs Subaru Trailseeker

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMSubaru
Price (RRP)$59,990$63,990
Range (WLTP)533km
Battery74.7 kWh
Power255kW280kW
0-100 km/h8.5s4.5s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km
Boot Space98L609L
Towing3,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 500 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Subaru Trailseeker opens at $63,990. That makes the GWM Tank 500 the more affordable entry point by $4,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $70,389 respectively.

The Subaru Trailseeker qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The GWM Tank 500, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the GWM Tank 500 and Subaru Trailseeker hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Tank 500 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Subaru Trailseeker gets a 14-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Subaru Trailseeker. The Subaru Trailseeker counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 500 uses a Hybrid producing 255kW and 648Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Subaru Trailseeker responds with a Dual Electric Motor making 280kW and 536Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.5 seconds.

The Subaru Trailseeker has the clear power advantage at 280kW vs 255kW. In the real-world sprint, the Subaru Trailseeker is 4.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 500 measures 5,078mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 233mm longer than the Subaru Trailseeker at 4,845mm (2,850mm wheelbase).

Boot space is 98L in the GWM Tank 500 and 609L in the Subaru Trailseeker, giving the Subaru Trailseeker a 511L advantage. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.2m

GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2mTighter
Best
Subaru Trailseeker AWD
11.2m
Best
GWM Tank 500
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru Trailseeker
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Trailseeker). The GWM Tank 500 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru Trailseeker if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Subaru Trailseeker takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Subaru Trailseeker has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 500 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 500 and Subaru Trailseeker?

The GWM Tank 500 is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Trailseeker by $4,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Tank 500 uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM Tank 500 and Subaru Trailseeker all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Trailseeker has the largest boot at 609L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 500 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Trailseeker makes the most power at 280kW. The Subaru Trailseeker is quickest to 100km/h in 4.5s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs