CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai i30 Fastback N vs Peugeot 408
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai i30 Fastback N vs Peugeot 408

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Fastbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Hyundai i30 Fastback N: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h and warranty, plus 1 other.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecHyundaiPeugeot
Price (RRP)TBC$57,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power206kW107kW
0-100 km/h9.4s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km4.5 L/100km
Boot Space436L508L
Towing1,300kg
Warranty5yr / 200k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Track the Hyundai i30 Fastback N & Peugeot 408

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 408 gets a 10-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N stands out with Apple CarPlay and heated front seats — features our data doesn't list for the Peugeot 408. The Peugeot 408 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof, power tailgate and Focal audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Hyundai i30 Fastback N gets alcantara / leather appointed n light seats upholstery while the Peugeot 408 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N uses a 2.0 T-GDi (Theta-II) producing 206kW and 392Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed n dct (wet clutch) with sequential manual mode to a FWD layout.

The Peugeot 408 responds with a Hybrid making 107kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.4 seconds.

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N has the clear power advantage at 206kW vs 107kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N measures 4,455mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 235mm shorter than the Peugeot 408 at 4,690mm (2,790mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 408 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 436L in the Hyundai i30 Fastback N and 508L in the Peugeot 408, giving the Peugeot 408 a 72L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.6m

TightestPeugeot 408 GT HybridTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Peugeot 408 GT Hybrid
11.2mTighter
Best
Hyundai i30 Fastback N N Limited Edition 2.0 T-GDi N DCT
11.6m
Worst
Hyundai i30 Fastback N N Limited Edition 2.0 T-GDi N DCT
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Peugeot 408 GT Hybrid
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestPeugeot 408Tightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai i30 Fastback N11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Peugeot 408Tightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Hyundai i30 Fastback N and $1,283/year for the Peugeot 408. That is a $1,140 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 408.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai i30 Fastback N if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 408 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Peugeot 408 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Peugeot 408 will save you roughly $1,140 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 408 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai i30 Fastback N and Peugeot 408?

The Peugeot 408 is the cheapest at $57,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 408 uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Peugeot 408 holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Hyundai i30 Fastback N, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 408 has the largest boot at 508L.

Which can tow the most?

The Peugeot 408 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai i30 Fastback N makes the most power at 206kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Fastbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars