Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot 408
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 6 Sep 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$56,100RRP
- no option data for this car
$57,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Mazda CX-80 & Peugeot 408
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-80 starts from $56,100 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 408 opens at $57,990. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $1,890.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,710 and $63,789 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 408 by roughly $5,555 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Mazda CX-80 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Peugeot 408. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 79% for the Peugeot 408.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Mazda CX-80, against 5 on the Peugeot 408.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 6 in the Peugeot 408.
Recalls on our record
Mazda CX-80
- REC-006434 · published 15 Sep 2025Due to a software programming issue of the Body Control Module (BCM), the instrument cluster fuel level may not operate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2025
Peugeot 408
- REC-006738 · published 29 Sep 2026Due to a software issue, the interior door handles may deactivate unexpectedly while the engine is running.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
- REC-006716 · published 8 Sep 2026Due to a software issue, the instrument panel cluster may fail to illuminate the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) warning if the front camera is blocked.Year range on the notice: 2024
- REC-006397 · published 29 Jul 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the threaded connection between the high-pressure fuel pump and the fuel rail may become loose.Year range on the notice: 2024 - 2025
- 1 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 408 gets a 10-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Peugeot 408 counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and Focal audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Peugeot 408 offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the Peugeot 408.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The Peugeot 408 responds with a Hybrid making 107kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.4 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 107kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda CX-80 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 300mm longer than the Peugeot 408 at 4,690mm (2,790mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 508L in the Peugeot 408, giving the Peugeot 408 a 250L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1971L vs 1583L. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $1,283/year for the Peugeot 408. That is a $1,111 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 408.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 408). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Peugeot 408 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Peugeot 408: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 74, but the Mazda CX-80 is $1,890 cheaper
The Peugeot 408 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 74), taking 2 of 7 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Peugeot 408 ahead by 35), performance (Mazda CX-80 ahead by 19), reliability (Mazda CX-80 ahead by 10). The Peugeot 408 will save you roughly $1,111 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 408 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Peugeot 408?
The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $56,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 408 by $1,890.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Peugeot 408 uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Mazda CX-80 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Peugeot 408 has the largest boot at 508L with the seats up (1,583L with the seats folded).
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The Mazda CX-80 is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
