CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 8 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecIsuzuMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$43,900TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power120kW110kW
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km
Boot Space311L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu MU-X and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Isuzu MU-X and 97% for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Isuzu MU-X, against 1 on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu MU-X and 7 in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Isuzu MU-X stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross responds with a 1.5L D4 Turbo making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a cvt automatic (8-speed sports mode) driving the front wheels.

The Isuzu MU-X has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m diameter

Average

Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Isuzu MU-X Turning circle · Ø 11.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.1 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross if: You or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 1 of 1 key spec categories. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Isuzu MU-X and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Isuzu MU-X makes the most power at 120kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs