CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Isuzu MU-X vs Renault Symbioz
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Renault Symbioz

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 3 Sep 2026, price 7 Oct 2026

Winner
Isuzu MU-X
Isuzu

Isuzu MU-X

From $43,900

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Diesel

Engine

Diesel

Power

120kW

Economy

6.4 L/100km

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

311L

72CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 72 vs 58, but the Renault Symbioz is $910 cheaper

View full details
SpecIsuzuRenault
Price (RRP)$43,900$42,990
Fuel typeDieselHybrid
Power120kW116kW
0-100 km/h—10.6s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km4.7 L/100km
Boot (seats up)311L563L
Towing3,500kg750kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Renault Symbioz

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu MU-X starts from $43,900 before on-road costs, while the Renault Symbioz opens at $42,990. That makes the Renault Symbioz the more affordable entry point by $910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,290 and $47,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Symbioz by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Isuzu MU-X

  • REC-006052 · published 8 Aug 2024Due to a software issue, the Engine Control Module (ECM) may incorrectly reduce the engine speed.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024
  • REC-005647 · published 30 Mar 2023Due to a manufacturing issue, the lower steering shaft attaching bolt may have a torque value lower than the required specification.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
  • REC-003752 · published 1 Dec 2016The fuel tank band fixing bolts may not be tightened to the correct torque specification.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • 2 more on the model page.

Renault Symbioz

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Renault Symbioz gets a 10.4-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Renault Symbioz responds with a Inline 4 making 116kW and 149Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.6 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 116kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 447mm longer than the Renault Symbioz at 4,413mm (2,638mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 563L in the Renault Symbioz, giving the Renault Symbioz a 252L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2138L vs 1668L. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 2,750kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.6m

TightestRenault Symbioz E-Tech Full HybridTightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Symbioz E-Tech Full Hybrid
11.1mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Symbioz E-Tech Full Hybrid
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault SymbiozTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu MU-X11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Renault SymbiozTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $1,340/year for the Renault Symbioz. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Renault Symbioz.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Symbioz). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Symbioz if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Isuzu MU-X: Top CarSorted Score, 72 vs 58, but the Renault Symbioz is $910 cheaper

The Isuzu MU-X comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (72 vs 58), taking 3 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Isuzu MU-X ahead by 52), practicality (Isuzu MU-X ahead by 20), fuel economy (Renault Symbioz ahead by 16). The Renault Symbioz will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Symbioz has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Renault Symbioz?

The Renault Symbioz is the cheapest at $42,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Isuzu MU-X by $910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Symbioz uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Isuzu MU-X holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Renault Symbioz, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Symbioz has the largest boot at 563L with the seats up (1,668L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Isuzu MU-X makes the most power at 120kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars