CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›JAC Hunter PHEV vs MG U9
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

JAC Hunter PHEV vs MG U9

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 7 Aug 2026, price 5 Oct 2026

Specifications in progress

JAC Hunter PHEV: we're still completing torque, 0-100km/h, turning circle and energy consumption.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecJACMG
Price (RRP)$49,988$52,990
Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Range (WLTP)100km—
Battery31.2 kWh—
Electric range100km—
Power360kW160kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min—
Fuel Economy1.6 kWh/100km7.9 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km5yr / No data
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the JAC Hunter PHEV & MG U9

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The JAC Hunter PHEV starts from $49,988 before on-road costs, while the MG U9 opens at $52,990. That makes the JAC Hunter PHEV the more affordable entry point by $3,002.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,987 and $58,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the JAC Hunter PHEV by roughly $10,875 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the JAC Hunter PHEV and MG U9 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the JAC Hunter PHEV and 91% for the MG U9.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Recalls on our record

JAC Hunter PHEV

None open on our record

MG U9

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

31.2kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The JAC Hunter PHEV features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the MG U9 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The JAC Hunter PHEV stands out with wireless charging and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the MG U9. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the JAC Hunter PHEV gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MG U9 offers artificial leather.

Drivetrain

The JAC Hunter PHEV uses a 2.0TGDI Turbo Petrol Direct Injection producing 360kW, sent through a 4dht to a 4WD layout.

The MG U9 responds with a 2.5L Turbo Diesel making 160kW and 520Nm, paired to a zf 8 speed automatic driving the rear wheels.

The JAC Hunter PHEV has the clear power advantage at 360kW vs 160kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The JAC Hunter PHEV measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 170mm shorter than the MG U9 at 5,500mm (3,300mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the MG U9 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.3m diameter

Large

MG U9 Explore
13.3m
←
MG U9 Explore
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.3 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
MG U9 Turning circle · Ø 13.3 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 11.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

2.0 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $77/year for the JAC Hunter PHEV and $2,252/year for the MG U9. That is a $2,175 annual difference in favour of the JAC Hunter PHEV.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 5 years (MG U9). The JAC Hunter PHEV has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC Hunter PHEV)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the JAC Hunter PHEV if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG U9 if: You or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

JAC Hunter PHEV: Top CarSorted Score, 75 vs 69

The JAC Hunter PHEV comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 69), taking 3 of 3 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (JAC Hunter PHEV ahead by 35), value (JAC Hunter PHEV ahead by 15), safety (MG U9 ahead by 13). The JAC Hunter PHEV will save you roughly $2,175 a year in fuel. The JAC Hunter PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, JAC Hunter PHEV and MG U9?

The JAC Hunter PHEV is the cheapest at $49,988 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG U9 by $3,002.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC Hunter PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: JAC Hunter PHEV and MG U9 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The JAC Hunter PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The JAC Hunter PHEV has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The JAC Hunter PHEV makes the most power at 360kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia