CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJAC Hunter PHEV vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

JAC Hunter PHEV vs KGM Musso EV

Two electric Utes go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJACKGM
Price (RRP)TBC$60,000
Range (WLTP)420km
Battery31.2 kWh80.6 kWh
Power360kW152kW
0-100 km/h10.9s
Max DC Charge300kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min
Fuel Economy1.6 kWh/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing3,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The JAC Hunter PHEV features a 12.8-inch touchscreen, while the KGM Musso EV gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso EV counters with heated front seats, ventilated seats, V2L and ambient lighting that the JAC Hunter PHEV does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The JAC Hunter PHEV uses a Turbo petrol PHEV producing 360kW, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 152kW and 339Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The JAC Hunter PHEV has the clear power advantage at 360kW vs 152kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 31.2kWh (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 80.6kWh (KGM Musso EV).

Space & Comfort

The JAC Hunter PHEV measures 5,457mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 297mm longer than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the JAC Hunter PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the JAC Hunter PHEV leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m diameter

Large

KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m
KGM Musso EV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC Hunter PHEV)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the JAC Hunter PHEV if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, JAC Hunter PHEV and KGM Musso EV?

The KGM Musso EV is the cheapest at $60,000 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The JAC Hunter PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Musso EV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Musso EV has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The JAC Hunter PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The JAC Hunter PHEV makes the most power at 360kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes