CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Musso EV vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso EV vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMToyota
Price (RRP)$60,000$65,690
Range (WLTP)420km
Battery80.6 kWh
Power152kW151kW
0-100 km/h10.9s12s
Max DC Charge300kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min
Fuel Economy10.7 L/100km
Boot Space532L
Towing1,800kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The KGM Musso EV starts from $60,000 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $65,690. That makes the KGM Musso EV the more affordable entry point by $5,690.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,000 and $72,259 respectively.

The KGM Musso EV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota LandCruiser 70, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Musso EV and Toyota LandCruiser 70 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The KGM Musso EV packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the KGM Musso EV and 2 in the Toyota LandCruiser 70. The KGM Musso EV adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota LandCruiser 70 misses.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso EV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The KGM Musso EV stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, ventilated seats, V2L and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso EV gets leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the KGM Musso EV and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso EV uses a Electric producing 152kW and 339Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 151kW and 430Nm, paired to a manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 152kW vs 151kW. In the real-world sprint, the KGM Musso EV is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso EV measures 5,160mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 170mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,990mm (3,085mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.2m

Toyota LandCruiser 70 Single Cab Chassis Workmate
11.8mTighter
Best
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m
Worst
KGM Musso EV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso EV and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The KGM Musso EV is the cheapest at $60,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $5,690.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 uses the least fuel at 10.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Musso EV and Toyota LandCruiser 70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Musso EV has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 152kW. The KGM Musso EV is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Cab Chassiss