Ford Ranger vs JAC Hunter PHEV
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford Ranger
From $37,130
Ute
Diesel
Diesel Turbo
125kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
JAC Hunter PHEV
Price TBC
Ute
Plug-in Hybrid
2.0TGDI Turbo Petrol Direct Injection
360kW
1.6 kWh/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
JAC Hunter PHEV: we're still completing price, torque, 0-100km/h, turning circle and energy consumption.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Ford Ranger & JAC Hunter PHEV
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Ranger and JAC Hunter PHEV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 84% for the Ford Ranger and 85% for the JAC Hunter PHEV.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The JAC Hunter PHEV packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Ford Ranger.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control. The JAC Hunter PHEV adds a 360-degree camera that the Ford Ranger misses.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
31.2kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Ranger features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the JAC Hunter PHEV gets a 10.4-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The JAC Hunter PHEV counters with wireless charging, heated front seats and ambient lighting that the Ford Ranger does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Ford Ranger gets cloth upholstery while the JAC Hunter PHEV offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Ford Ranger uses a Diesel Turbo producing 125kW and 405Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The JAC Hunter PHEV responds with a 2.0TGDI Turbo Petrol Direct Injection making 360kW, paired to a 4dht driving all four wheels.
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the clear power advantage at 360kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Ranger measures 5,225mm long on a 3,270mm wheelbase, 105mm shorter than the JAC Hunter PHEV at 5,330mm (3,110mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the JAC Hunter PHEV leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.9m diameter
Large
Based on 12.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 11.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Ford Ranger and $77/year for the JAC Hunter PHEV. That is a $1,890 annual difference in favour of the JAC Hunter PHEV.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Ford Ranger) vs $77 (JAC Hunter PHEV). The JAC Hunter PHEV saves you roughly $1,890 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Ranger) vs 7 years / 150,000km (JAC Hunter PHEV). The JAC Hunter PHEV has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —7yr (JAC Hunter PHEV).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Ranger if: You or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the JAC Hunter PHEV if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The JAC Hunter PHEV takes 3 of 3 key spec categories. The JAC Hunter PHEV will save you roughly $1,890 a year in fuel. The JAC Hunter PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Ranger and JAC Hunter PHEV?
The Ford Ranger is the cheapest at $37,130 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Ranger and JAC Hunter PHEV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Ranger has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The JAC Hunter PHEV makes the most power at 360kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
