JAC Hunter PHEV vs Mitsubishi Triton
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The JAC Hunter PHEV features a 12.8-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses a Turbo petrol PHEV producing 360kW, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.
The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the clear power advantage at 360kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The JAC Hunter PHEV measures 5,457mm long on a 3,260mm wheelbase, 137mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the JAC Hunter PHEV generally means more rear legroom.
0For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m diameter
Large
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $77/year for the JAC Hunter PHEV and $2,109/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $2,032 annual difference in favour of the JAC Hunter PHEV.
Estimated annual total: $77 (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs $2,109 (Mitsubishi Triton). The JAC Hunter PHEV saves you roughly $2,032 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC Hunter PHEV)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the JAC Hunter PHEV if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The JAC Hunter PHEV takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The JAC Hunter PHEV will save you roughly $2,032 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, JAC Hunter PHEV and Mitsubishi Triton?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The JAC Hunter PHEV makes the most power at 360kW.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
