JAC Hunter PHEV vs Mitsubishi Triton
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 7 Aug 2026, price 5 Oct 2026
JAC Hunter PHEV: we're still completing torque, 0-100km/h, turning circle and energy consumption.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the JAC Hunter PHEV & Mitsubishi Triton
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The JAC Hunter PHEV starts from $49,988 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Triton opens at $43,690. That makes the Mitsubishi Triton the more affordable entry point by $6,298.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,987 and $48,059 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the JAC Hunter PHEV by roughly $10,305 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the JAC Hunter PHEV and Mitsubishi Triton hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the JAC Hunter PHEV and 86% for the Mitsubishi Triton.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the JAC Hunter PHEV, against 4 on the Mitsubishi Triton.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.
Recalls on our record
JAC Hunter PHEV
None open on our record
Mitsubishi Triton
- REC-005634 · published 20 Mar 2023The product was sold without the warning information that is required for products containing button/coin batteries.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2022
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
31.2kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The JAC Hunter PHEV features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Triton gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The JAC Hunter PHEV stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Triton. The Mitsubishi Triton counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the JAC Hunter PHEV gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Triton offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses a 2.0TGDI Turbo Petrol Direct Injection producing 360kW, sent through a 4dht to a 4WD layout.
The Mitsubishi Triton responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 470Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.3 seconds.
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the clear power advantage at 360kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The JAC Hunter PHEV measures 5,330mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 10mm longer than the Mitsubishi Triton at 5,320mm (3,130mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Triton generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Mitsubishi Triton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.4m diameter
Large
Based on 12.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.7 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $77/year for the JAC Hunter PHEV and $2,138/year for the Mitsubishi Triton. That is a $2,061 annual difference in favour of the JAC Hunter PHEV.
Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (JAC Hunter PHEV) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Triton). The Mitsubishi Triton has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (JAC Hunter PHEV)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the JAC Hunter PHEV if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer JAC's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Triton if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
JAC Hunter PHEV: Top CarSorted Score, 75 vs 66, but the Mitsubishi Triton is $6,298 cheaper
The JAC Hunter PHEV comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 66), taking 1 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (JAC Hunter PHEV ahead by 32), technology (JAC Hunter PHEV ahead by 20), performance (JAC Hunter PHEV ahead by 17). The JAC Hunter PHEV will save you roughly $2,061 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Triton adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, JAC Hunter PHEV and Mitsubishi Triton?
The Mitsubishi Triton is the cheapest at $43,690 before on-road costs. That undercuts the JAC Hunter PHEV by $6,298.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The JAC Hunter PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: JAC Hunter PHEV and Mitsubishi Triton all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The JAC Hunter PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Triton has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The JAC Hunter PHEV makes the most power at 360kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
