CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJeep Patriot vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Jeep Patriot vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Jeep Patriot: we're still completing price, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, warranty and fuel tank.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecJeepToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$97,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power115kW227kW
0-100 km/h8.6s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km8.9 L/100km
Boot Space652L700L
Towing454kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Jeep Patriot & Toyota LandCruiser 300

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Jeep Patriot stands out with heated front seats — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. The Toyota LandCruiser 300 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Jeep Patriot uses a 2.0L DOHC 16V dual VVT petrol producing 115kW and 190Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the clear power advantage at 227kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Jeep Patriot measures 4,424mm long on a 2,635mm wheelbase, 556mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota LandCruiser 300 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 652L in the Jeep Patriot and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 48L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 454kg. That 3,046kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.8m

TightestJeep Patriot Sport 2.0 manualTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Jeep Patriot Sport 2.0 manual
10.8mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m
Worst
Jeep Patriot Sport 2.0 manual
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestJeep PatriotTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Jeep PatriotTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota LandCruiser 30011.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Jeep Patriot and $2,537/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 300. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Jeep Patriot.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Jeep Patriot if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Jeep Patriot will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Jeep Patriot and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Jeep Patriot uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota LandCruiser 300 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Jeep Patriot, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 makes the most power at 227kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs