CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Actyon vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Actyon vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMMazda
Price (RRP)$44,500$44,240
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power120kW138kW
0-100 km/h7.4s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km7.5 L/100km
Boot Space668L570L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the KGM Actyon & Mazda CX-60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The KGM Actyon starts from $44,500 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $260.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,950 and $48,664 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Actyon features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Actyon stands out with power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Actyon gets leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The KGM Actyon uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Actyon measures 4,740mm long on a 2,680mm wheelbase, matching the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 668L in the KGM Actyon and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the KGM Actyon a 98L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.8m

TightestKGM Actyon K50Tightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Actyon K50
10.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m
Worst
KGM Actyon K50
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM ActyonTightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM ActyonTightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda CX-6010.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the KGM Actyon and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-60.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (KGM Actyon) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The Mazda CX-60 saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Actyon) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The KGM Actyon has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Actyon if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-60 will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Actyon has a clear edge. The KGM Actyon adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Actyon and Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $44,240 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Actyon by $260.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-60 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Actyon has the largest boot at 668L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Actyon has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs