KGM Torres vs Mitsubishi ASX
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi ASX opens at $37,740. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $2,750.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $41,514 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi ASX by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi ASX gets a 10.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Torres stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mitsubishi ASX. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.
The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.
The KGM Torres has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the KGM Torres is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 430mm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,270mm (2,634mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the KGM Torres a 105L advantage.
For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The KGM Torres takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi ASX will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Mitsubishi ASX?
The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $2,750.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — KGM Torres all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The KGM Torres makes the most power at 120kW. The KGM Torres is quickest to 100km/h in 11.8s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
