CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Sportage vs Renault Arkana
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Sportage vs Renault Arkana

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaRenault
Price (RRP)$38,490$39,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power115kW116kW
0-100 km/h9.4s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space543L485L
Towing1,650kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Kia Sportage & Renault Arkana

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Kia Sportage starts from $38,490 before on-road costs, while the Renault Arkana opens at $39,990. That makes the Kia Sportage the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,339 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Arkana by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Sportage features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4-inch digital dash, while the Renault Arkana gets a 9.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Kia Sportage gets cloth upholstery while the Renault Arkana offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Kia Sportage uses a Petrol producing 115kW and 192Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Renault Arkana responds with a Petrol making 116kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.4 seconds.

The Renault Arkana has the clear power advantage at 116kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Sportage measures 4,685mm long on a 2,755mm wheelbase, 117mm longer than the Renault Arkana at 4,568mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Sportage generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 543L in the Kia Sportage and 485L in the Renault Arkana, giving the Kia Sportage a 58L advantage.

For towing, the Kia Sportage leads with a 1,650kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.4m

TightestRenault Arkana IntensTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Arkana Intens
10.8mTighter
Best
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4m
Worst
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Renault Arkana Intens
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault ArkanaTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia Sportage11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Renault ArkanaTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Kia Sportage and $1,682/year for the Renault Arkana. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Renault Arkana.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Kia Sportage) vs $1,682 (Renault Arkana). The Renault Arkana saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Sportage) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Arkana). The Kia Sportage has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Sportage if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Arkana if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Sportage takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Renault Arkana will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Sportage has a clear edge. The Kia Sportage adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Sportage and Renault Arkana?

The Kia Sportage is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Renault Arkana by $1,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Arkana uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Sportage all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Sportage has the largest boot at 543L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia Sportage has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,650kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Sportage has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Arkana makes the most power at 116kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs