Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Audi Q5
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
From $83,600
SUV
Petrol
2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol
184kW
8.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
472L

Audi Q5
From $80,900
SUV
Petrol
4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging and MHEV plus technology
150kW
5.7 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
520L
Track the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque & Audi Q5
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque starts from $83,600 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q5 opens at $80,900. That makes the Audi Q5 the more affordable entry point by $2,700.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $91,960 and $88,990 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q5 by roughly $3,705 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque features a 11.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Audi Q5 gets a 10.1-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats and Meridian audio that you will not find on the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 counters with Bang & Olufsen audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets grained leather upholstery while the Audi Q5 offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 3-zone in the Audi Q5.
Drivetrain
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol producing 184kW and 365Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.6 seconds.
The Audi Q5 responds with a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging and MHEV plus technology making 150kW and 340Nm, paired to a 7-speed s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque measures 4,371mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 346mm shorter than the Audi Q5 at 4,717mm (2,820mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Audi Q5 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 520L in the Audi Q5, giving the Audi Q5 a 48L advantage.
For towing, the Audi Q5 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 11.8m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,366/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and $1,625/year for the Audi Q5. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q5.
Estimated annual total: $2,366 (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) vs $1,625 (Audi Q5). The Audi Q5 saves you roughly $741 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q5). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Audi Q5).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Audi Q5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Audi Q5 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi Q5 will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi Q5 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Audi Q5?
The Audi Q5 is the cheapest at $80,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque by $2,700.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Audi Q5 uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Audi Q5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Audi Q5 has the largest boot at 520L.
Which can tow the most?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque makes the most power at 184kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is quickest to 100km/h in 7.6s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!








