CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Volvo EX60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Volvo EX60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLand RoverVolvo
Price (RRP)$83,600$86,990
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)610km
Battery83 kWh
Power184kW275kW
0-100 km/h7.6s5.9s
10-80% Charge Time26 min
Fuel Economy8.3 L/100km
Boot Space472L523L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque & Volvo EX60

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque starts from $83,600 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX60 opens at $86,990. That makes the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque the more affordable entry point by $3,390.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $91,960 and $95,689 respectively.

The Volvo EX60 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

83kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque features a 11.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo EX60 gets a 15-inch display and 11.4-inch instruments.

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Volvo EX60. The Volvo EX60 counters with ventilated seats and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets grained leather upholstery while the Volvo EX60 offers nordico. Climate control is 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 3-zone in the Volvo EX60.

Drivetrain

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol producing 184kW and 365Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.6 seconds.

The Volvo EX60 responds with a Electric making 275kW and 480Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.9 seconds.

The Volvo EX60 has the clear power advantage at 275kW vs 184kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volvo EX60 is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque measures 4,371mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 432mm shorter than the Volvo EX60 at 4,803mm (2,970mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo EX60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 523L in the Volvo EX60, giving the Volvo EX60 a 51L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo EX60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.6m

TightestVolvo EX60 P6 ElectricTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo EX60 P6 Electric
11.0mTighter
Best
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Hoxton Edition P250
11.6m
Worst
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Hoxton Edition P250
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo EX60 P6 Electric
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo EX60Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo EX60Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX60). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo EX60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo EX60 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Volvo EX60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Volvo EX60?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the cheapest at $83,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo EX60 by $3,390.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses the least fuel at 8.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Volvo EX60 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volvo EX60 has the largest boot at 523L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo EX60 makes the most power at 275kW. The Volvo EX60 is quickest to 100km/h in 5.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best electric SUVs