CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLeapmotor B10 vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Leapmotor B10 vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLeapmotorMazda
Price (RRP)$37,888$39,990
Range (WLTP)361km
Battery56.2 kWh
Power160kW140kW
0-100 km/h8s8.7s
Max DC Charge140kW
10-80% Charge Time20 min
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km
Boot Space382L438L
Towing1,500kg1,800kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Leapmotor B10 starts from $37,888 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. That makes the Leapmotor B10 the more affordable entry point by $2,102.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,677 and $43,989 respectively.

The Leapmotor B10 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-5, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Leapmotor B10 and Mazda CX-5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 93% for the Leapmotor B10 and 95% for the Mazda CX-5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Leapmotor B10 packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Leapmotor B10 and 6 in the Mazda CX-5.

Feature Showdown

The Leapmotor B10 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 15.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Leapmotor B10 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and panoramic roof that you will not find on the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Leapmotor B10 gets fabric upholstery while the Mazda CX-5 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Leapmotor B10 uses a Electric producing 160kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 252Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Leapmotor B10 has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Leapmotor B10 is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Leapmotor B10 measures 4,515mm long on a 2,735mm wheelbase, 60mm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,575mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Leapmotor B10 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 382L in the Leapmotor B10 and 438L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 56L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

Leapmotor B10 Style BEV
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0m
Worst
Leapmotor B10
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Leapmotor B10) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). The Leapmotor B10 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Leapmotor B10 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Leapmotor's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Leapmotor B10 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The Leapmotor B10 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Leapmotor B10 and Mazda CX-5?

The Leapmotor B10 is the cheapest at $37,888 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-5 by $2,102.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Leapmotor B10 and Mazda CX-5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 438L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Leapmotor B10 has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Leapmotor B10 makes the most power at 160kW. The Leapmotor B10 is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs