Mazda CX-3 vs Honda HR-V
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mazda CX-3 & Honda HR-V
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-3 starts from $27,800 before on-road costs, while the Honda HR-V opens at $30,300. That makes the Mazda CX-3 the more affordable entry point by $2,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,580 and $33,330 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-3 features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Honda HR-V gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Honda HR-V counters with ambient lighting that the Mazda CX-3 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-3 uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 195Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Honda HR-V responds with a Petrol making 89kW and 145Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.2 seconds.
The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 89kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda HR-V is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-3 measures 4,275mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 70mm shorter than the Honda HR-V at 4,345mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda HR-V generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 264L in the Mazda CX-3 and 304L in the Honda HR-V, giving the Honda HR-V a 40L advantage.
For towing, the Mazda CX-3 leads with a 1,535kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 535kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.0m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-3 and $1,767/year for the Honda HR-V. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Honda HR-V.
Estimated annual total: $1,796 (Mazda CX-3) vs $1,767 (Honda HR-V). The Honda HR-V saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda HR-V). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda HR-V).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Honda HR-V if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-3 and Honda HR-V trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Honda HR-V will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Honda HR-V has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-3 and Honda HR-V?
The Mazda CX-3 is the cheapest at $27,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Honda HR-V by $2,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Honda HR-V uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Honda HR-V all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Honda HR-V has the largest boot at 304L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,535kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-3 makes the most power at 110kW. The Honda HR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
