Mazda CX-30 vs Suzuki S-Cross
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki S-Cross opens at $43,490. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $13,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $47,839 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki S-Cross packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-30.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-30 and 6 in the Suzuki S-Cross.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki S-Cross gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-30 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Suzuki S-Cross. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Suzuki S-Cross responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki S-Cross is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 95mm longer than the Suzuki S-Cross at 4,300mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-30 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-30 and 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross, giving the Suzuki S-Cross a 80L advantage.
For towing, the Suzuki S-Cross leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,539/year for the Suzuki S-Cross. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-30) vs $1,539 (Suzuki S-Cross). The Suzuki S-Cross saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross). The Mazda CX-30 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Suzuki S-Cross takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki S-Cross has a clear edge. The Mazda CX-30 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross?
The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $13,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-30 and Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Suzuki S-Cross has the largest boot at 430L.
Which can tow the most?
The Suzuki S-Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mazda CX-30 has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-30 makes the most power at 114kW. The Suzuki S-Cross is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
