CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mazda CX-30 vs MG HS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-30 vs MG HS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Oct 2026, price 30 Oct 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Mazda CX-30G20 Pure10101
MG HSVibe8?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecMazdaMG
Price (RRP)$34,760$33,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$34,760RRP

  • cannot be matched: Keyless Entry, Electric Driver Seat and Power Tailgate not offered

$33,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power114kW125kW
0-100 km/h—9.6s
Fuel Economy6.3 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Measured consumption (AAA)6.4 L/100kmAAA test: this grade, 2024 model year7.2 L/100kmAAA test: this grade, 2025 model year
Boot (seats up)317L507L
Towing1,200kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited10yr / 250k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Measured rows: Australian Automobile Association Real-World Testing Program (realworld.org.au), the on-road result for the vehicle each test names, shown beside the manufacturer's figures rather than in place of them and never scored. Mazda CX-30 test page MG HS test page

Track the Mazda CX-30 & MG HS

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-30 starts from $34,760 before on-road costs, while the MG HS opens at $33,990. That makes the MG HS the more affordable entry point by $770.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,236 and $37,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

We hold no ANCAP data for the Mazda CX-30. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.

Recalls on our record

Mazda CX-30

  • REC-001591 · published 21 Mar 2021The boot's power liftgate may partially lower unexpectedly from the fully opened position when the vehicle is parked facing uphill on a slope in high ambient temperature.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021

MG HS

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the MG HS gets a 10.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-30 stands out with head-up display — features our data doesn't list for the MG HS. The MG HS counters with panoramic roof and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The MG HS responds with a Petrol making 125kW and 275Nm, paired to a 7-speed dct driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.6 seconds.

The MG HS has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 260mm shorter than the MG HS at 4,655mm (2,765mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 317L in the Mazda CX-30 and 507L in the MG HS, giving the MG HS a 190L advantage.

For towing, the MG HS leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestMazda CX-30 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
MG HS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MG HS Vibe
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-30Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-30Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
MG HS11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,967/year for the MG HS. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG HS). The MG HS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG HS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

MG HS: Top CarSorted Score, 77 vs 66

The MG HS comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (77 vs 66), taking 5 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: technology (MG HS ahead by 39), safety (MG HS ahead by 31), practicality (MG HS ahead by 11). The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG HS has a clear edge. The MG HS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and MG HS?

The MG HS is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-30 by $770.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

MG HS holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We hold no ANCAP data for Mazda CX-30, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG HS has the largest boot at 507L with the seats up (1,484L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG HS has the longest warranty that does not depend on dealer servicing at 7 years.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG HS makes the most power at 125kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs