CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Qashqai
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Qashqai

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 4 Oct 2026, price 5 Oct 2026

SpecMazdaNissan
Price (RRP)$29,990$45,640
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power114kW140kW
Fuel Economy6.3 L/100km4.1 L/100km
Boot (seats up)317L404L
Towing1,200kg750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-30 & Nissan Qashqai

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-30 starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Qashqai opens at $45,640. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $15,650.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $50,204 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Nissan Qashqai by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Mazda CX-30

  • REC-001591 · published 21 Mar 2021The boot's power liftgate may partially lower unexpectedly from the fully opened position when the vehicle is parked facing uphill on a slope in high ambient temperature.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021

Nissan Qashqai

  • REC-006662 · published 13 Jul 2026Due to a software issue with the Lithium-ion Battery Controller (LBC) the vehicle may enter a fail-safe mode whilst driving.Year range on the notice: 2025 - 2026
  • REC-006618 · published 5 Jun 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the fuel pipe may chafe against the support bracket and become damaged.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2024
  • REC-006450 · published 16 Oct 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the fuel pipe may chafe against the support bracket and become damaged.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2024
  • 4 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-30 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Nissan Qashqai gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-30 stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-30 uses a Petrol producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Nissan Qashqai lines up making 140kW and 311Nm, paired to a reduction drive (automatic) driving the front wheels.

The Nissan Qashqai has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-30 measures 4,395mm long on a 2,655mm wheelbase, 30mm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai at 4,425mm (2,665mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Qashqai generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 317L in the Mazda CX-30 and 404L in the Nissan Qashqai, giving the Nissan Qashqai a 87L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-30 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.1m

TightestMazda CX-30 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Nissan Qashqai ST-L e-POWER
11.1m
Worst
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Qashqai ST-L e-POWER
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-30Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-30Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Nissan Qashqai11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30 and $1,169/year for the Nissan Qashqai. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Nissan Qashqai.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Qashqai). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Nissan Qashqai).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Qashqai if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Nissan Qashqai: Top CarSorted Score, 70 vs 62, but the Mazda CX-30 is $15,650 cheaper

The Nissan Qashqai comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (70 vs 62), taking 3 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (Nissan Qashqai ahead by 30), fuel economy (Nissan Qashqai ahead by 20), safety (Nissan Qashqai ahead by 16). The Nissan Qashqai will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Nissan Qashqai has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai?

The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Qashqai by $15,650.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan Qashqai uses the least fuel at 4.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Nissan Qashqai holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda CX-30, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Nissan Qashqai has the largest boot at 404L with the seats up (1,328L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-30 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Qashqai makes the most power at 140kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons
Read our in-depth Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Qashqai analysis

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars